• Categories

Archive for January, 2010

If George W. Bush…

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Nothing personal, I just thought this one was good.

If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?

If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent “Austrian language,” would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?

If George W. Bush had mis-spelled the word “advice” would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as proof of what a dunce he is?

If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite?

If George W. Bush’s administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?

If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?

If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 or more Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved.

If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?

If George W Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had spent more than all the Presidents combined since George Washington, would you have approved?

So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can’t think of anything? Don’t worry. He’s done all this in 10 months — so you’ll have 3 years and 2 months to come up with an answer.

The Drug Problem in America

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

The other day, someone at a store in our town read that a methamphetamine lab had been found in an old farmhouse in the adjoining county and he asked me a rhetorical question, ”Why didn’t we have a drug problem when you and I were growing up?”

I replied: “I had a drug problem when I was young”:

I was drug to church on Sunday morning.

I was drug to church for weddings and funerals.

I was drug to family reunions and community socials no matter the weather.

I was drug by my ears when I was disrespectful to adults.

I was also drug to the woodshed when I disobeyed my parents, told a lie, brought home a bad report card, did not speak with respect, spoke ill of the teacher or the preacher, or if I didn’t put forth my best effort in everything that was asked of me.

I was drug to the kitchen sink to have my mouth washed out with soap if I uttered a profane four-letter word.

I was drug out to pull weeds in mom’s garden and flower beds and cockleburs out of dad’s fields.

I was drug to the homes of family, friends, and neighbors to help out some poor soul who had no one to mow the yard, repair the clothesline, or chop some firewood;

and, if my mother had ever known that I took a single dime as a tip for this kindness, she would have drug me back to the woodshed.

Those drugs are still in my veins; and they affect my behavior in everything I do, say, and think. They are stronger than cocaine, crack, or heroin; and, if today’s children had this kind of drug problem, America would be a better place.

~author unknown~

Keep Your Fork.

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

There was a young woman who had been diagnosed with a terminal illness and had been given three months to live. So as she was getting her things ‘in order,’ she contacted her Pastor and had him come to her house to discuss certain aspects of her final wishes.

She told him which songs she wanted sung at the service, what scriptures she would like read, and what outfit she wanted to be buried in.

Everything was in order and the Pastor was preparing to leave when the young woman suddenly remembered something very important to her.

‘There’s one more thing,’ she said excitedly.

‘What’s that?’ came the Pastor’s reply.

‘This is very important,’ the young woman continued. ‘I want to be buried with a fork in my right hand.’

The Pastor stood looking at the young woman, not knowing quite what to say.

That surprises you, doesn’t it?’ the young woman asked.

‘Well, to be honest, I’m puzzled by the request,’ said the Pastor.

The young woman explained. ‘My grandmother once told me this story, and from that time on I have always tried to pass along its message to those I love and those who are in need of encouragement.. In all my years of attending socials and dinners, I always remember that when the dishes of the main course were being cleared, someone would inevitably lean over and say, ‘Keep your fork.’ It was my favorite part because I knew that something better was coming…like velvety chocolate cake or deep-dish apple pie. Something wonderful and with substance!’

So, I just want people to see me there in that casket with a fork in my hand and I want them to wonder ‘What’s with the fork?’ Then I want you to tell them: ‘Keep your fork, the best is yet to come…’

The Pastor’s eyes welled up with tears of joy as he hugged the young woman good-bye. He knew this would be one of the last times he would see her before her death. But he also knew that the young woman had a better grasp of heaven than he did. She had a better grasp of what heaven would be like than many people twice her age, with twice as much experience and knowledge. She KNEW that something better was coming.

At the funeral people were walking by the young woman’s casket and they saw the cloak she was wearing and the fork placed in her right hand. Over and over, the Pastor heard the question, ‘What’s with the fork?’ And over and over he smiled.

During his message, the Pastor told the people of the conversation he had with the young woman shortly before she died. He also told them about the fork and about what it symbolized to her. He told the people how he could not stop thinking about the fork and told them that they probably would not be able to stop thinking about it either.

He was right. So the next time you reach down for your fork let it remind you, ever so gently, that the best is yet to come. Friends are a very rare jewel, indeed they make you smile and encourage you to succeed. They lend an ear, they share a word of praise, and they always want to open their hearts to us.

Show your friends how much you care. Remember to always be there for them, even when you need them more. For you never know when it may be their time to ‘Keep your fork…’

Cherish the time you have, and the memories you share …

Being friends with someone is not an opportunity but a sweet responsibility..

And keep your fork.

ATTENTION! HAND SALUTE!

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

Col. Robert Lewis Howard
July 11, 1939 – December 23, 2009

Retired Col. Robert Lewis Howard died Wednesday, December 23 around noon in Waco, Texas of pancreatic cancer. He was a recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor and according to many historians our nation’s most decorated soldier. He was 70.

Robert Lewis Howard joined U.S. Army at Alabama in 1956 and retired from the army as a Colonel in 1992. He was awarded our nation’s most esteemed award, the Congressional Medal of Honor, for his services during the Vietnam War. Col. Robert L. Howard was nominated three times for this award, but could only receive it once according to law.

America loves war heroes. There was Sgt. York in WWI, Audie Murphy in WWII. But in Vietnam, there were only scapegoats. Except there’s Robert Howard, who single-handedly captured 44 enemy soldiers and brought them back alive for questioning. Robert Howard is an unknown hero no longer. Col. Robert Lewis Howard will be buried in Arlington National Cemetery.

Col. Howard is the stuff that Special Forces legends are made of, an example that young men seek to emulate today in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

Rest in Peace, Sir. You’ve earned it. 

bugler[1] TAPS Click to hear.

The President of the United States in the name of The Congress takes pride in presenting the MEDAL OF HONOR to

FIRST LIEUTENANT

ROBERT L. HOWARD

UNITED STATES ARMY

for service as set forth in the following CITATION:

For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity in action at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty. 1st Lt. Howard [Then SFC.], distinguished himself while serving as platoon sergeant of an American-Vietnamese platoon which was on a mission to rescue a missing American soldier in enemy controlled territory in the Republic of Vietnam. The platoon had left its helicopter landing zone and was moving out on its mission when it was attacked by an estimated 2-company force. During the initial engagement, 1st Lt. Howard was wounded and his weapon destroyed by a grenade explosion. 1st Lt. Howard saw his platoon leader had been wounded seriously and was exposed to fire. Although unable to walk, and weaponless, 1st Lt. Howard unhesitatingly crawled through a hail of fire to retrieve his wounded leader. As 1st Lt. Howard was administering first aid and removing the officer’s equipment, an enemy bullet struck 1 of the ammunition pouches on the lieutenant’s belt, detonating several magazines of ammunition. 1st Lt. Howard momentarily sought cover and then realizing that he must rejoin the platoon, which had been disorganized by the enemy attack, he again began dragging the seriously wounded officer toward the platoon area. Through his outstanding example of indomitable courage and bravery, 1st Lt. Howard was able to rally the platoon into an organized defense force. With complete disregard for his safety, 1st Lt. Howard crawled from position to position, administering first aid to the wounded, giving encouragement to the defenders and directing their fire on the encircling enemy. For 3 1/2 hours 1st Lt. Howard’s small force and supporting aircraft successfully repulsed enemy attacks and finally were in sufficient control to permit the landing of rescue helicopters. 1st Lt. Howard personally supervised the loading of his men and did not leave the bullet-swept landing zone until all were aboard safely. 1st Lt. Howard’s gallantry in action, his complete devotion to the welfare of his men at the risk of his life were in keeping with the highest traditions of the military service and reflect great credit on himself, his unit, and the U.S. Army.

Fifth Grade Assignment

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

A fifth grade teacher in a Christian school asked her class to look at TV commercials and see if they could use them to communicate ideas about God. Here are some of the results. Wouldn’t this be great if it was taught in every school.

God is like:

BAYER ASPIRIN – He works miracles.

FORD – He’s got a better idea.

COKE – He’s the real thing.

TIDE – He gets the stains out others leave behind.

GENERAL ELECTRIC – He brings good things to life.

WALMART – He has everything.

ALKA-SELTZER – Try Him, you’ll like Him.

SCOTCH TAPE – You can’t see Him, but you know He’s there.

DELTA – He’s ready when you are.

ALLSTATE – You’re in good hands with Him.

VO-5 HAIR SPRAY – He holds through all kinds of weather

DIAL SOAP – Aren’t you glad you have Him? Don’t you wish everybody did?

The U.S. POST OFFICE – Neither rain, nor snow, nor sleet nor ice
will keep Him fromHis appointed destination.

CHEVROLET – The heart beat of America

BOUNTY – He is the quicker picker upper; Can handle the tough jobs;
And He won’t fall apart on you

HALLMARK CARDS – He cared enough to send His very best.
(My Personal Favorite)

BLESSINGS FROM MY HOUSE TO YOURS
AND MAY GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

The Lie of BIG FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

By William J. Dell – 13 January 2010

In the Bill of Rights of our U. S. Constitution, ratified December 15, 1791, we find the following two Amendments:

Amendment 9 – Construction of Constitution.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment 10 – Powers of the States and People.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

By these the U. S. Constitution clearly limited the Federal Government to EXTERNAL issues as defined in Article I. Issues dealing with import and export of goods from the United States. Issues of representing the United States to other national governments. Issues relating to the defense of the United States from external forces. Issues relating to interstate commerce, but not intrastate commerce, of the 50 States.

It will be helpful to define two words – provide and promote – before we discuss the Federal Government’s involvement in social-justice programs. To do this I have used Noah Webster’s 1828 Dictionary. I have done this so that we might get closer to the intent of our Founding Fathers as they wrote our Constitution.

Provide: 1. To procure beforehand; to get, collect or make ready for future use; to prepare. 2. To furnish; to supply; followed by with. 3. To stipulate previously.

Promote: 1. To forward; to advance; to contribute to the growth, enlargement or excellence of any thing valuable or to the increase of any thing evil; as, to, promote learning, knowledge, virtue or religion; to promote the interests of commerce or agriculture; to promote the arts; to promote civilization or refinement; to promote the propagation of the gospel; to promote vice and disorder. 2. To excite; as, to, promote mutiny. 3. To exalt; to elevate; to raise; to prefer in rank or honor.

With these definitions in mind, let us look at the Preamble of our Constitution:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. [Emphasis added.]

You will note that the Founding Father used “provide” when mentioning the defense of our nation, but they used “promote” when mentioning the general Welfare. Clearly they intended to convey in their language that the Federal Government was responsible for the defense of our nation from its enemies because “provid[ing] for the common defense” is enumerated in Article I, Section 8 as follows:

To define and punish Piracies…; To declare War…; To raise and support Armies…; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval forces;

No such delineation of responsibilities can be found however regarding “promot[ing] the general Welfare.” Our Founding Father intended to express a difference between these two elements of the Preamble. One “provide for the common defense” was an assignment TO DO. The other “promote the general Welfare” was an assignment to ENCOURAGE but NOT be involved with directly.

To fund unconstitutional federal social-justice programs, the Federal Government has and continues to plundered the property of its citizens and take revenues rightly belonging to the 50 States. If we are to have social-justice programs, they rightly belong to the 50 States because of the Tenth Amendment. Additionally, how social-justice program are administered also rightly belong to the 50 Governors and their Legislatures not the President and the Congress.

If the citizens of the separate 50 States refuse to fund a program within their state borders, the other 49 States’ citizens should NOT be taxed by the federal government to provide it. Redistribution of wealth by the federal government between the 50 States and/or their citizens for social-justice programs is unconstitutional. Our Founding Fathers only desired that the Federal Government “promote the general Welfare” not provide for it.

It is a lie that the Federal Government has to raise and give monies to the 50 States and to the States’ counties and municipalities for social-justice programs. States, counties, and municipalities are taxing entities. As such, they are empowered to raise their own revenues if their citizens will allow them. The problem is that the funds are NOT available to State and local taxing entities because of the plundering of  We the People’s  property by the Federal Government for unconstitutional social-justice programs. Additionally in many instances,  We the People   do not want these social-justice programs, in either federal or state form, because they destroy the self-reliance of a free citizenry.

Our government was instituted to protect every individual citizen’s right to life, liberty and property. Social-justice programs all require that the property of “haves” be redistributed to “have nots” in one form or another. There are two greatest latent cancers of the “government dole.”

1. It destroys the self-reliance of the recipient. It develops within the recipient and “entitlement mentality” which creates an attitude of if the government is going to take care of me why should I work or strive to improve myself.

2. It destroys the initiative of the provider. It develops in the provider a “defeatist mentality” which creates an attitude of why work harder for a greater increase in property because the government is just going to steal it anyway.

For more than sixty years, the Socialist-DINOs (Democrats In Name Only) and Marxists in our Federal Government have through the “New Deal,” the “Fair Deal,” and the “Great Society” caused this cancer to fester in our nation. Now ObamaCare threatens to explode the malignancy throughout the entire fiber of our Constitutional Republic destroying personal liberty and property in its wake. When that is gone, there will be NO CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC! We will be left with a Welfare Socialist State.

I find it interesting that those who struggled so long to be free of the chains of their ancestors have now chosen to cheerleader us along a path that can only lead us back to the chains of slavery. Free citizens are self-reliant and live in a Constitutional Republic protected by the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Citizens of a Welfare Socialist State are slaves dependant on the State for their substance. Those who desire a Welfare Socialist State should consider the following: Any government that has the power to redistribute wealth under the guise of assisting the less fortunate, by plundering rather than protecting the property rights of its citizens, can and will eventually redistribute every citizens wealth – even your wealth. Why? Because there is always someone less fortunate than you! [From: The Race Card, 30 September 2009]

There must be some cause, some good reason, why Americans, who fought tyranny over 200 years ago to obtain their liberty, are now eager to accept tyranny from a federal government determined to encircle them with the “chains of slavery.”

Lost Generation

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

A palindrome is a word, line, verse, number, sentence, etc., reading the same backward as forward. For example, “Madam, I’m Adam” or “Poor Dan is in a droop.”

The following Palindrome by Jonathan Reed has an interesting message. The pessimist will accept the “forward reading” going down. An optimist; however, will prefer the “backward reading” beginning with the last line and reading up.

Lost Generation
by Jonathan Reed

I am part of a Lost Generation
and I refuse to believe that
I can change the world.
I realize this may be a shock but
“True happiness comes from within”
is a lie, and
“Money will make me happy.”
So in thirty years I will tell my children
they are not the most important thing in my life.
My employer will know that
I have my priorities straight because
work
is more important than
family
I tell you this
Once upon a time
Families stayed together
but this will not be true in my era
this is a quick fix society
Experts tell me
thirty years from now I will be celebrating the tenth anniversary of my divorce
I do not concede that
I will live in a country of my own making
In the future
Environmental destruction will be the norm
No longer can it be said that
My peers and I care about this earth
It will be evident that
My generation is apathetic and lethargic
It is foolish to presume that
There is hope.

And all of this will come true unless we choose to reverse it.

America as the Last Man Standing

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

By Geert Wilders, Chairman
Party for Freedom, the Netherlands

This speech was given at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem.

Dear friends,

Thank you very much for inviting me.

I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.

First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe . Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem .

The Europe you know is changing.

You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe . These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe , street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe . With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam , Marseille and Malmo in Sweden . In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.

In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.

Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear ‘whore, whore’. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.

In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin . The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels , because he was drinking during the Ramadan.

Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya , Israel . I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe . San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France . One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays.

The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey .

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. I call the perpetrators ‘settlers’. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries. Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.

Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means ‘submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam ‘the most retrograde force in the world’, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel . First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines , Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan , Lebanon , and Aceh in Indonesia . Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The war against Israel is not a war against Israel . It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel , Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel , they can get everything. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’. In my country, the Netherlands , 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a danger greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome , Athens and Jerusalem .

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe , American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe ‘s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.

We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic stupidity from destroying the free world that we know.

American Suicide

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

The following is well worth the time it takes to read. If you care for and love our country as I do. Please take the time to read this; it ought to be a wake-up call for all of us – Wherever we stand! This speech is VERY SOBERING!!

Our nation and the future of our great Constitutional Republic is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we, ordinary Americans, don’t reverse the onslaught The American Dream will pass from our view and be lost to our children and grandchildren. Ignorance is a terrible thing – Yet, one day soon someone, perhaps an American, will ask the question – Why did the American people not stop the destruction of their nation?

Early in 2004, a brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, ‘Mexifornia,’ explaining how immigration – both legal and illegal was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.

Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. When he finished, there was no applause. A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the conference. Every American in that room knew that everything Governor Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States and continues still today – six years later.

There must be some cause, some good reason, why Americans, who fought tyranny over 200 years ago to obtain their liberty, are now eager to accept tyranny from a federal government determined to encircle them with the “chains of slavery.”

William J. Dell, Editor
Freedom-Fighters Forum

I Have a Plan to Destroy America
Richard D. Lamm – January 2004
(Former Democratic Governor Colorado, 1975 – 1987)

I have a secret plan to destroy America. If you believe, as many do, that America is too smug, too white bread, too self-satisfied, too rich, let’s destroy America. It is not that hard to do. History shows that nations are more fragile than their citizens think. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and they all fall and that “an autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” Here is my plan:

1. We must first make America a bilingual – bicultural country. History shows, in my opinion, that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. One scholar, Seymour Martin Lipset, put it this way: “The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans.”

2. I would then invent “multiculturalism” and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal: that there are no cultural differences that are important. I would declare it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rate is only due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out-of-bounds.

3. We can make the United States a “Hispanic Quebec” without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently, “The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentriy and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.” I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural sub-groups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than Americans emphasizing their similarities.

4. Having done all this, I would make our fastest-growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from [high] school.

5. I would then get the big foundations and big business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of Victimology. I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was all the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.

6. I would establish dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would “celebrate diversity.” “Diversity” is a wonderfully seductive word. It stresses differences rather than commonalities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other – that is, when they are not killing each other. A “diverse,” peaceful or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together, and we can take advantage of this myopia.

Look at the ancient Greeks. Dorf’s World History tells us: “The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games in honor of Zeus and all Greeks venerated the shrine of Apollo at Delphi. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet, all these bonds together were not strong enough to overcome two factors … (local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions… )” If we put the emphasis on the ‘Pluribus’ instead of the ‘Unum,’ we can Balkanize America as surely as Kosovo.’

7. Then I would place all subjects off-limits. Make it taboo to talk about. I would find a word similar to ‘heretic’ in the 16th century – that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like “racist” or “xenophobe” halt argument and conversation. Having made America a bilingual – bicultural country, having established multi-culturalism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of Victimology, I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: “because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good.” I would make every individual immigrant sympatric and ignore the cumulative impact.

8. Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis’s book “Mexifornia.” This book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. So please, please, if you feel America deserves to be destroyed, please, please, don’t buy this book! This guy is on to my plan.

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.” Noam Chomsky, American Linguist and U S Media and Foreign Policy Critic

Just Feeling Better All the Time

Friday, January 1st, 2010

By James Baldwin – 12/28/2009 5:22 PM

Ya just gotta love it! Obama’s solution to preventing terrorists blowing up airplanes is to prevent them accessing their carry-on luggage within one hour of landing. WOW! That sure makes me feel secure. Only one teensy little problem.. Bombs can be detonated at any time during a flight. If the Obama Administration won’t stop a bomb from getting aboard in the first place it won’t matter much whether it is detonated five minutes after takeoff or an hour and a half before landing; EVERYBODY onboard dies. The fanatic succeeds.

Now, what about passengers not being allowed to use the toilet within one hour of landing? I don’t want some suspicious person using the toilet at any time on a flight if he might be assembling a bomb in there. It has nothing to do with one hour before landing!

This administration better get its head screwed on straight. If you want to stop terrorists start focusing on the most likely candidates.

Let us think, how many terrorist acts have been perpetrated by 70 year old Mexican grandmas with a walker? Hmm, NONE! It’s not likely unless her support hose are made of C-4! How many terrorist acts have been committed by seven year old English girls? None! What do Obama and Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano think the kid is going to do, load up her Barbie doll with Plastique?

How many Caucasian American male citizens have attempted to blow-up airplanes. Only one comes to this reader’s mind and that crime was back in Colorado in the 1950s. There may be more, and because there may be more, I am willing to allow there may be good reason to profile me and pay me extra attention as I prepare to board an airplane.

But, and this is the great “BUT”, in the last decade the terrorists bombing airplanes have ALL been of middle-eastern descent and between the ages of 18 and 30 years old. None of them were U.S. citizens. Most did not have current visas. So until Obama gets serious about profiling these individuals WE THE PEOPLE should never trust his platitudes so skillfully read off a teleprompter. We are all at risk until we American citizens who fit the profile(s) accept that our safe arrival at our destination is worth being inconvenienced a bit before boarding. We should not expect to tolerate the insecurity of wondering if that guy across the aisle got explosives, flammables or other weapons aboard.

And, WE THE PEOPLE shouldn’t have to wonder if that guy using the bathroom or his laptop within an hour of landing is a terrorist.

Until President Obama stops straddling the politically correct fence and does what is necessary rather than what will appease his Muslim friends (is it permitted to call them Muslims?) then I, as one of the pickets in that fence he straddles, intend to keep poking him where it hurts most until he does the right thing and acts to, “Protect and Defend the Constitution” and the American people.