Beware of Article 5 – Understanding a Con-Con

By William J. Dell – 6 October 2010

There have been many emails circulating on the Internet calling for a constitutional convention to propose amendments to our Constitution that Congress will NOT propose. There are hazards to this process guaranteed by Article 5 of our Constitution. History suggest the validity of the concerns expressed in the following video. After all, as pointed out, the first Constitutional Convention was only AUTHORIZED to amend the Articles of Confederation – BUT THEY DID MUCH MORE! There is NO Guarantee that any Constitutional Convention would be limited to particular interests as 32 States currently would like. Once the floodgate is opened, the Ship of State will be in great peril. Remember well that even the unsinkable Titanic – SANK!!

I personally do NOT believe that delegates to ANY new Constitutional Convention would be as reasoned or have the best interests of our nation at heart as our Founding Fathers did. You ask why? It is because in 1787, we had STATESMEN at the Constitutional Convention! Unfortunately – TODAY we would have only POLITICIANS, who by characteristic have only SELF-INTEREST!! 535 members of Congress who would appoint delegates to serve their selfish Progressive interests and NOT those of the Constitutional Republic granted by our current Constitution.

The following Video is 36 minutes in length but should be viewed by every serious Freedom-Fighter and Constitutionalist. The educational information is well presented. Learn why state legislatures should not apply to Congress for a constitutional convention (con-con) by viewing “Beware of Article V: Understanding Legislators’ Limited Federal Power.” This powerful documentary is based on evaluations of the con-con process by prominent constitutional scholars. (1999) Further learn why ANY State with a current call for a con-con should repeal and rescind their call!

The following is a list of the Jurists and legal scholars opposed to a con-con:

Warren E. Burger, Chief Justice of the United States
Arthur J. Goldberg, associate Justice, United States Supreme Court
Bruce van Sickle, United States District Judge, ND
Robert H. Bork, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (ret)
Aleander Aleinkoff, University of Michigan Law School
Florian Bartosic, University of California at Davis
Charles L. Black, Yale Law School
C. Christopher Broen, University of Maryland Law School
Neil Cogan, Southern Methodist University Law School
Walter E. Dellinger, Duke University Law School
Thomas I. Emerson, Yale Law School
Jefferson B. Fordham, University of Utah Law School
Gerald Gunther, Stanford University Law School
Rex E. Lee, Brigham Young University Law School, President of BYU
Betsy Levin, Dean – University of Colorado Law School
Forrest McDonald, Scholar – National Endowment for the Humanities
Arval A. Morris, University of Washington Law School
Charles E. Rice, Notre Dame Law School
Terrance Sandalow, Dean – University of Michigan Law School
Robert L. Schwartz, University of New Mexico Law School
Lawrence H. Tribe, Harvard Law School
Charles Alan Wright, University of Texas at Austin Law School